ChartModo logo ChartModo logo
cryptonews 2026-01-02 12:33:50

Coinbase Faces Backlash as Base Devs Point to “Corporate Double Speak”

Coinbase is facing renewed scrutiny from parts of the crypto community after criticism from Base developers and traders reignited a long-running debate over how the exchange supports projects built within its ecosystem. The latest backlash centers on accusations of “corporate double-speak,” with critics arguing that Coinbase’s public messaging around openness and decentralization has not always aligned with its actions, particularly around token listings and ecosystem support. Traders Call Out Coinbase Over Base and Memecoin Listings The discussion gained traction after a crypto trader posting under the name rbthreek criticized Coinbase leadership on X, pointing to what he described as a persistent gap between statements and behavior. He referenced Coinbase’s earlier reluctance to list tokens native to Base, its Ethereum layer-2 network. I see Brian on the feed over the holiday and I’m ngl I personally don’t think it’s in good faith. They’ve run this same playbook for a long time now, remember we’re dealing w the same people at CB who refused to list a single Base coin for over a year. And when they finally did… — rb3k (@rbthreek) January 1, 2026 When listings eventually came, he argued, they were poorly handled and followed by what he described as a wave of low-quality listings, reinforcing skepticism among builders and traders. He also highlighted comments previously made by Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong questioning the substance of meme coins, contrasting those remarks with the exchange’s decision to list several Solana-based meme coins that later suffered steep losses, while only a handful of Base meme coins have been listed to date. According to traders, Coinbase listed at least 11 Solana-based meme coins in 2025, many of which later fell sharply in price, while only three Base meme coins have been listed to date. Another trader, Turtle, said Coinbase had failed to visibly support projects backed by Coinbase Ventures, such as Arcadia and Giza, despite promoting other initiatives like Zora. He argued that brand optics matter and that inconsistent support risks undermining confidence in the broader Base ecosystem. Not all voices were critical, as a user known as Zk said Base leadership, particularly Jesse Pollak, had been supportive in practice and suggested that tensions stem partly from differing expectations. I think Jesse supports memes tbh. He's been nothing but excellent in my experience, and he has been the most supportive coinbase staff of anyone. Brian doesn't appear to get them from the video he made, and it's absolutely wrong that they are just a picture and a name attached… — zk. (@zk_lmao) January 1, 2026 He argued that some meme communities focused primarily on short-term price action and listings rather than long-term collaboration, and that the Base team’s focus shifted last year as it worked to ship the Base app. According to Zk, much of the frustration reflects a shared desire for Base to succeed, even if participants disagree on how that should happen. Concerns about sentiment were further detailed by a user named Amy, who traced what she described as a gradual reversal in Base community confidence. Yeah you're spot on. The listing situation was the start of the reversal for Base sentiment wise. Jesse had his pulse on the chain and created a culture where people were building and bridging here. Successful projects hit a point where they had maxed their potential on Base… — Amy (@BasedAmy0x) January 1, 2026 She linked the downturn to stalled exchange listings, competition with Solana-based memes, confusion around the rollout of creator and “coined content” tokens, delayed decentralized exchange integration, and unmet expectations around the Base app’s rewards and inclusion. She said perceptions that Coinbase favored affiliated projects led some builders and users to leave the chain. Creator Coins Test Coinbase’s Vision for an Open Marketplace Armstrong responded directly to the discussion, saying Coinbase now offers access to millions of tokens through decentralized exchange integrations. Coinbase has millions of tokens available now via DEX. That’s the best way to get more tokens listed. CEX listings are more difficult for variety of reasons, not all in our control. Also, don’t treat any listing as an endorsement – we’re trying to build the everything exchange,… — Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) January 2, 2026 He reiterated that centralized listings are more complex and not endorsements, framing Coinbase’s role as providing a marketplace rather than making judgments on value. In a subsequent post, Armstrong outlined Coinbase’s priorities for 2026, including expanding an “everything exchange” and bringing more users on-chain through Base and Coinbase’s developer tools. Here are our top priorities for 2026 at Coinbase: 1) Grow the everything exchange globally (crypto, equities, prediction markets, commodities – across spot, futures, and options) 2) Scale stablecoins and payments 3) Bring the world onchain through @CoinbaseDev , @base chain,… — Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) January 1, 2026 The debate intensified after a creator token tied to YouTuber Nick Shirley on Base briefly neared a $9 million valuation before plunging 67% within hours . On-chain data showed strong royalty earnings, raising questions about whether creator tokens drive adoption or short-term speculation. The post Coinbase Faces Backlash as Base Devs Point to “Corporate Double Speak” appeared first on Cryptonews .

Loe lahtiütlusest : Kogu meie veebisaidi, hüperlingitud saitide, seotud rakenduste, foorumite, ajaveebide, sotsiaalmeediakontode ja muude platvormide ("Sait") siin esitatud sisu on mõeldud ainult teie üldiseks teabeks, mis on hangitud kolmandate isikute allikatest. Me ei anna meie sisu osas mingeid garantiisid, sealhulgas täpsust ja ajakohastust, kuid mitte ainult. Ükski meie poolt pakutava sisu osa ei kujuta endast finantsnõustamist, õigusnõustamist ega muud nõustamist, mis on mõeldud teie konkreetseks toetumiseks mis tahes eesmärgil. Mis tahes kasutamine või sõltuvus meie sisust on ainuüksi omal vastutusel ja omal äranägemisel. Enne nende kasutamist peate oma teadustööd läbi viima, analüüsima ja kontrollima oma sisu. Kauplemine on väga riskantne tegevus, mis võib põhjustada suuri kahjusid, palun konsulteerige enne oma otsuse langetamist oma finantsnõustajaga. Meie saidi sisu ei tohi olla pakkumine ega pakkumine